Survey sent by Survey Monkey to 51 GPs who had attended the Waitangi Symposium. The response rate was low however the Faculty Board is still interested in receiving feedback from its members to assist it in setting a strategic direction.
Waitangi 2014 Symposium
How would you rate the Waitangi Symposium?
|V poor||Poor||Good||V good||Excellent|
What were the things that you enjoyed about the Waitangi Symposium?
|Local GP experiences||4|
|Topics relevant to general practice||3|
What were some aspects of the Waitangi Symposium that could be improved?
|More relevant topics||2|
|Coffee/tea on time||1|
Would you wish to see the Northland Faculty having a political advocacy role?
Comments related to wanting to have a local voice at local and national level. This was to emphasise Northland issues and advocate for greater resources and equitable funding for general practice.
Would you wish to see the Northland Faculty having a clinical advocacy role?
Comments related to having a voice on Northland wide projects and to support GPs in a collegial way, especially those who might be struggling
What sort of role would you like to see the Faculty have with the PHOs?
Respondants wanted the Faculty to be an intermediary and advocate for GPs with the PHOs
The Faculty is interested in supporting GPs in their first five years post PRIMEX. What ideas do you have on how to achieve this?
What do you see as being the three priority areas for the Faculty?
Top three weighted priorities:
- Workforce development
- Clinical governance
Net Promoter Score
How likely is it that you would recommend the activities of the Northland Faculty to a friend or colleague?
Result = 13